David Brooks Will See You Now
The United States faces a crisis of disconnection, with too many people failing to truly know their fellow humans, says author and The Atlantic staff writer David Brooks.
He wrote his 2025 book, How to Know a Person, with the aim of helping bridge that gap.
In conversation with Leader’s Edge Editor in Chief Sandy Laycox during The Council’s Insurance Leadership Forum, Brooks discussed how writing the book changed him. He emphasized the importance of “small emotions” and talked about how today’s experienced professionals can help point their younger peers toward successful careers. This interview has been edited for clarity.

The diminishers are the people you meet at a party or wherever, where they don’t really see you, they don’t care about you. They don’t ask you questions. Sometimes I leave a party and I think, “You know, that whole time nobody asked me a question.” And I’ve come to believe that only about 30% or 40% of humans are question askers. And one thing diminishers do is, they stereotype. They do a thing called stacking, which is: I learned one fact about you. You’re from Texas, and therefore I make a whole series of assumptions about who you must be. And I could tell you as a journalist, those stereotypes are always wrong. People never fit into a stereotype. And so those are diminishers.
Illuminators are the people who make you feel warm and lit up. I’m about to drop a name. I’ve been interviewed by Oprah twice in my life. And when you’re in her presence, the beam of her attention is boom. She’s like, superstar-level. When I was writing the book, I would watch her interviews on TV, and she is quiet when things are sad, but she’s warm. She talks back. Her eyes change. She’s a very active listener. And so it’s a great skill to just be burning calories, that’s how heavily you’re listening. And she has that ability. But a lot of people have that ability. They just make you feel like, “Wow, I’m really smart. This person thinks I’m so funny.”
I teach at college, so [have] a lot of college seniors who are obsessed with what am I going to do next? And one young woman said to me, “I wish I was young in the ’90s, I think it would have been so much easier.” And I told her, “Well, I was young in the ’90s, or at least younger, and it was easier.” And I think it was easier.
There are a lot of ways we can go with this, but one is just thinking of a career pathway. So first, when I got to college, it felt like there were eight careers. You could be a teacher, lawyer, you could sell insurance, whatever. But there was a limited number, so it didn’t seem like that hard a choice. Now it seems there are an infinite number, and there are no clear pathways. And then in some fields, they want you to go through the narrowest of little apertures. For example, a lot of young smart kids, they want to go into Goldman Sachs. And so there are 3,000 interns at Goldman Sachs every summer. There are 360,000 applicants for those 3,000. We’re trying to squeeze all these talented people into one little lane.
What we need is something called opportunity pluralism, lots of different lanes. But then a lot of young people don’t know [how to find their lane]. Say they want to go into the insurance business—they have no idea what the steps are, they don’t know anybody in it. There’s like, nobody. It’s like an ocean. I had one of my students, she graduated from Yale, so she’s a very smart, talented lady. And she said, “When I was in college, everything was station to station. There was always the next test, the next thing to apply for. Then I got out of college, I was in a vast ocean with no markers, I had no idea where to steer. And so if people could provide some lane markers, say here’s the next step [or] talk to me [about] how my life worked…”
If we could give them some clarity, then at least they say, “Oh, that’s a path.” And then they can know how to take the next step. But instead, we just leave them out in the vast ocean of nothing. And so my lesson, and I tell this to my own kids who are in their 20s, [take] three adventures a decade. Do three things that are different each decade. If you do that in your 20s, you’ll find things you like, you’ll find things you don’t like. And it’s super important to find what you don’t like. But the second and big thing is you widen your horizon of risk. And I shouldn’t talk about risk at an insurance company [event].
Well, first, by letting them talk before you dominate a meeting. I mean, the biggest thing is questions and then taking time.
I’ve been in some very healthy organizations and some very unhealthy ones. There are some organizations that make a mark on you and some that don’t. You meet somebody who went to Morehouse College, you know they’re a Morehouse man. That’s an organization that leaves a mark. Procter & Gamble, somebody worked at Procter & Gamble, you knew they worked at Procter & Gamble.
What do those [healthy] organizations have? Well, first, a clear purpose, everybody on the team knows their role in that purpose. Second, every voice counts. Third, they have retreats like this one, where you see each other before the makeup goes on and after the makeup comes off. Fourth, there’s music; it’s very hard to hate somebody if you dance with them. Often the organizations have a sacred origin story: this is how we came to be; this is how we had hard times; this is how we overcame them. People could see themselves in that story. And then finally, they’re generative. When people leave the organization, they want to take the culture to the next place they go. So if they left General Electric, the next company they go to, they want to create a little GE, because they found that’s a really great culture.
A leader can decide [if they’re] going to invest in making a [healthy] organization, or [if] it’s going to be transactional, people pass through, and they might make some money or not, but it’s not going to be something that changed them.
I’m writing a book on motivation and desire. I live in a system, in my colleges where I teach, where people think intelligence is the most important part of ability. I completely reject that. I think determination and motivation are the most important. You want to hire people who will run through walls, and who are so passionately dedicated to learning, they will be different at 30 than they were at 20, different at 40 than they were at 30. And they just keep growing. They’re machines of learning. And it’s very hard to find that because it doesn’t show up in a resume.
I’ve asked people who hire for companies like this one, how do you locate the people who will try hard? And it’s actually very hard to do. I have one guy who just said, “I ask them straight out, ‘Are you ambitious?’” Turns out people won’t lie. They say, “Yeah, I’m really ambitious.” And it could be a bad kind of ambition, which is selfish, but it could be a good kind of ambition.
And the other thing, one friend of mine said, “I ask them what tabs are open on your browsers.” What are you doing when nobody’s telling you what to do? You can tell a lot about how a person, whether they’re curious or not, by what they’re doing when nobody’s telling them what to do.
That’s a good question. You know, you love all your books like children. I wrote two things that I’m proud of. One was, my oldest friend in the world committed suicide. And I wrote a piece about what it was like to not know how to walk through that with him. I think it helped people. I wrote a piece about my kid’s bar mitzvah. It’s always the personal ones.
It’s funny, I can remember my favorite headline that I’ve ever written. I interviewed a French philosopher named Bernard-Henri Lévy. And if anybody knows who this guy is, he’s an astoundingly good-looking French guy. He’s got long, black, flowing hair, and he wears his shirts open to his navel. So he’s like glamour, glamour. And so my headline for that was God Is Dead, but My Hair Is Perfect.




