P&C

Swiss Re Identifies Large Nat Cat Insurance Gap

While man-made disasters are largely covered, the gap between natural catastrophe losses and insurance coverage has grown. Can we expand business in these underserved segments?
By Zach Ewell

In the July/August 2019 edition of Leaders Edge, Mike McGavick, senior advisor to the AXA and AXA XL CEOs, discussed the issue of underinsurance and how it is leaving many sectors ill prepared for evolving threats. Here, we follow up with a look at some numbers from Swiss Re on the subject of catastrophe insurance gaps.

Global insured losses from natural catastrophes and man-made disasters were $165 billion in 2018, according to Swiss Re Institutes’ “Natural Catastrophes and Man-made Disasters in 2018” report. Only $85 billion of those losses were insured. This number shines a spotlight on the growing gap between protected and unprotected losses from disasters.

Global insured losses from natural catastrophes alone were $76 billion in 2018, the report says. Over 60% of those losses were caused from secondary perils, or the secondary effects of primary perils. But what are primary and secondary perils?

Primary perils are threats known for severe loss potential for the insurance industry. They are usually well monitored hazards, such as earthquakes and hurricanes, according to Swiss Re. Secondary perils, however, include heavy precipitation, winter storms, river flooding and wildfires and historically haven’t received much monitoring from the insurance industry, Swiss Re says. Secondary perils can also be a direct result of primary perils, leading to a residual effect, such as a tsunami generated by an earthquake.

“The distinction between primary and secondary perils is actually quite inward looking (for the insurance industry), and it is based on the availability, or lack thereof, of adequate catastrophe risk models,” Brigitte Meier, assistant vice president of communications at Swiss Re Management Ltd., tells Leaders Edge. “Risk models have historically been developed for peak risks only, and only later risk modelling of secondary perils has started. Secondary perils are extremely complex to model, due to the local nature of their manifestation, requiring much more computational power and local data.”

For both primary and secondary perils, climate change will play a large role in the frequency of these catastrophes. Climate change may also alter the intensity and nature of these disasters. “With climate change, we expect wildfires and droughts, some of the secondary perils, to occur more frequently,” Meier said. “Also increased precipitation due to more water vapor contained in the atmosphere will likely lead to more flood events, another secondary peril. It is possible that they might be labelled primary perils too, in the future.”

For man-made disasters in 2018, insurance covered $9 billion out of the total $10 billion in damages, contrasted to insured losses of $76 billion out of $155 billion in natural catastrophes.

“The existing protection gap is an opportunity for insurers to strengthen global resilience,” Jérôme Jean Haegeli, Swiss Re’s group chief economist, said in a press release promoting the natural catastrophes report. “Underwriting catastrophe business profitably means looking at peak and also forward-looking trends on secondary perils. By leveraging the latest technology, insurers can focus more on developing appropriately regionalized models to assess the risk posed by secondary perils and develop a greater product range and targeted distribution for catastrophe covers.”

More people live in coastal cities and developments than ever before. As coastal building continues, larger losses from natural disasters are expected. “Climate change is expected to cause significantly more extreme rainfall and flash flooding in many areas,” Meier says. “At the same time, increasing urbanization and associated sealing of surfaces will lead to larger water-related losses. It is therefore paramount to analyze and disentangle the contributing loss drivers in order to better understand the changing risk landscape.”

Currently the protection gap for 2017 and 2018 combined adds up to $280 billion in losses for natural catastrophes alone, Swiss Re says. There is a lot of opportunity to provide needed protection in this market as the world climate continues to change each year.

“Insurance has not kept pace, and the gap between uninsured and insured losses remains stubbornly large,” Meier says. “The fact that the insurance industry paid out record claims of $144 billion in 2017, however, is good news, showing signs of progress.”

Zach Ewell Contributing Writer Read More

More in P&C

Don't Make Dangerous Decisions
P&C Don't Make Dangerous Decisions
Knowing what to look for when developing your internal cyber-security reporting ...
P&C The Impact of “California’s GDPR” from Cyber Insurance Industry Perspective
We found two key takeaways to help brokers better prepare for the new year.
Silent No More
P&C Silent No More
Cyber claims made under traditional P&C policies that may be silent on the subje...
Warring Factions
P&C Warring Factions
Citing war and terrorism exclusions for cyber claims could gut the protection.
Trade Credit Digital Market
P&C Trade Credit Digital Market
Trade credit insurance is seeing growth via an online market...