What’s Driving Liability Verdicts?

Some jurisdictions have been labeled “judicial hellholes” by the American Tort Reform Foundation.
By David Tobenkin Posted on March 2, 2020

An affiliate, the American Tort Reform Foundation, has since 2002 documented jurisdictions that it terms “judicial hellholes,” in which, the foundation contends, “civil court judges systematically apply laws and court procedures in an unfair and unbalanced manner, generally to the disadvantage of defendants.”

The foundation’s 2018-2019 report names the following as the nation’s “most unfair” regions, courts and legislative bodies presiding over civil litigation.

  • California
  • Florida
  • New York City
  • St. Louis
  • Louisiana
  • Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas
  • New Jersey Legislature
  • Madison and St. Clair Counties, Illinois
  • St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota

Wherever it occurs, social inflation, which is the tendency of jurors to award higher sums over time for successful tort liability claims, is an ongoing phenomenon that has little to do with the merits of the case—or even the law in some instances. There is no hard evidence identifying the specific reason for continuously escalating liability verdicts, but among theorized causes are:

  • General fatigue toward corporations and organizations
  • A belief, based on the high salaries of some executives, celebrities and others, that corporations have unlimited funds to settle litigation claims
  • A sense that wrongs in society must be righted
  • Greater attorney involvement in claims, which often lengthens the time frame of claims and their severity
  • Litigation financing, which provides more investor money to plaintiffs to fund liability litigation in exchange for a share of settlements.

Social inflation makes it more difficult to properly price liability insurance and, in some cases, write it altogether.

“We don’t believe we can get an adequate rate in many locations,” says Rob Francis, executive vice president for underwriting and operations of ProAssurance Corp. “There are states and locations in states where pricing has not reached the point where it adequately covers losses, and we are very wary to do business in some jurisdictions, such as West Virginia, that are known as plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions where it is difficult to defend.”

More in Industry

Alternative Capital and Brokerage? Still Going Strong
Industry Alternative Capital and Brokerage? Still Going Strong
Q&A with Amrit David, Managing Director in the Investment Bank at Barclays
Industry M&A Utopia
Last year remained record-setting in brokerage M&A, and most signs point to more...
We're Definitely Curious
Industry We're Definitely Curious
Brokerages want to check an insurtech’s industry conformation before buying th...
Back in Fashion
Industry Back in Fashion
Great wealth and greater risk drive growth and M&A in personal lines.
Soft Landing?
Industry Soft Landing?
Several indicators weigh against a sustained hard market.
Brexit: Mergers as Usual
Industry Brexit: Mergers as Usual
While U.K. brokerages remain in a delicate position, some st...